Author :
Abstract
Bu makalede, dünyada ve Türkiye’de son yıllarda eğitim alanında gerçekleştirilen reform çalışmalarının temel felsefesini oluşturan nosyonların başında yer alan bilimsel okuryazarlık temasının öngördüğü bilimin doğası anlayışının, öğ- rencilere etkili, kalıcı bir biçimde kazandırılması hususunun toplum ve eğitim sistemleri açısından taşıdığı önem üzerinde durulmaktadır. Ayrıca makalede, bilimin doğası anlayışının özellikle fen konularının öğretimi esnasında öğrencilere nasıl kazandırılabileceği ile ilgili bazı tespitler ve değerlendirmelere de de- ğinilmektedir. Bu bağlamda, konuya ilişkin detaylı analiz yapma imkânı tanıyan son birkaç yıla ait bazı araştırmaların sayısal verileri de göz önünde bulundurulduğunda, Türkiye’de özellikle fen derslerinde bilim okuryazarlığı ve bilimin doğası ile ilgili anlayışların öğrencilere kazandırılması noktasında daha önceki dönemlere oranla bazı gelişmelerin kaydedildiği görülmekle beraber, yine de gelinen nokta itibariyle akademik başarı düzeyinin yeterli seviyede olmadığı ifade edilmelidir
Keywords
Abstract
This artcle focuses on the signifcance of science and educaton systems in terms of bringing in an effectve and lastng understanding of science, which is the beginning of the notons that consttute the basic philosophy of the reform studies carried out in the feld of educaton in the world and Turkey in recent years, in the light of the scientfc literacy theme. It also mentons some of the determinatons and evaluatons of how the nature of science can be taught to students during the teaching of science subjects. In this context, considering the numerical data of some researches of the last few years which provide detailed analysis of the subject, it can be seen that some developments are recorded in Turkey compared to the previous periods, especially in science courses, where understanding of science literacy and nature of science is given to students, It should nevertheless be stated that the level of academic achievement is not at a sufcient level in terms of the point reached
Keywords
- Abd-El-Khalick, F. & Akerson, V.L. (2004). Learning about nature of science as conceptual change: Factors that mediate the development of preservice elementary teachers views of nature of science. Science Education, 88, 785-810.
- Abd-El-Khalick, F. (2001). Embedding nature of science instruction in preservice elementary science courses: Abandoning scientism, but… Journal of Science Teacher Education, 12, 215-233.
- Abd-El-Khalick, F. (2005). Developing deeper understandings of nature of science: The impact of a philosophy of science course on preservice science teachers’ views and instructional planning. International Journal of Science Education, 27(1), 15-42.
- Abd-El-Khalick, F. (2012). Examining the sources for our understandings about science: Enduring conflations and critical issues in research on nature of science in science education. International Journal of Science Education, 34(3), 353-374.
- Abd-El-Khalick, F., & Lederman, N. G. (2000). Improving science teachers' conceptions of nature of science: a critical review of the literature. International journal of science education, 22(7), 665-701.
- Akerson, V. L. & Abd-El Khalick. (2003). Teaching elements of the nature of science. A yearlong case study of a fourth-grade teacher. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 40(10), 1025-1049.
- Akerson, V.L., & Hanuscin, D. (2007). Teaching the nature of science through inquiry: Results of a three-year professional development program. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 44(5), 653-680.
- American Association for the Advancement of Science. (1989). Science for all Americans: American Association for the Advancement of Science.
- American Association for the Advancement of Science. (1990). Science for all Americans:
- American Association for the Advancement of Science. (1993). Benchmarks for science literacy:
- Backhus, D.A., & Thompson, K.W. (2006). Addressing the nature of science in preservice science teacher preparation programs: Science educator perceptions. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 17(1), 65-81.
- Bell, R. L., Lederman, N. G., & Abd-El Khalick, F. (2000). Developing and acting upon one’s conception of yhe nature of science. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 37(6), 563-581.
- Bybee, R. W. (1997). Achieving scientific literacy: From purposes to practices. Portsmouth, NH: Heinemann.
- Bybee, R. W.; Ellis, J. D.; & Matthews, M. R. (1992). Teaching about the history and nature of science and technology: An introduction. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 29 (4), 327-329.
- Collette, A. T., & Chiappetta, E. L. (1984). Science Instruction in the Middle and Secondary Schools. The CV Mosby Company, 11830 Westline Industrial Drive, St. Louis, MO 63146.
- DeBoer, G. E. (1991). A History of ideas in science education: Implications for practice. NewYork: Teacher College.
- Doğan, N., & Abd-El-Khalick, F. (2008). Turkish grade 10 students’ and science teachers’ conceptions of nature of science: A national study. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 45(10), 1083-1112.
- Doğan-Bora, N., Arslan, O.,&Cakiroglu, J. (2006). Lise ögrencilerinin bilim ve bilim insanı hakkındaki gorusleri. Hacettepe Universitesi Egitim Fakultesi Dergisi, 31, 32-44.
- Driver, R., Leach, J., Millar, R., & Scott, P. (1996). Young people’s ımages of science, Buckingham: Open University.
- King, B. B. (1991). Beginning Teachers' Knowledge of and Attitude toward History and Philosophy of Science, Science Education, 75(1), 135-141.
- Klopfer, L. (1969). The teaching of science and the history of science. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 6, 87-95.
- Köseoğlu, F., Atasoy, B., Kavak, N., Akkuş, H., Budak, E., Tümay, H., Kadayıfçı, H., Taşdelen, U. (2003). Yapılandırıcı Öğrenme Ortamı İçin Bir Fen Ders Kitabı Nasıl Olmalı. Ankara: Asil.
- Köseoğlu, F., Tümay, H., Budak, E. (2008). Bilimin doğası hakkında paradigma değişimleri ve öğretimi ile ilgili yeni anlayışlar. Gazi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 28(2), 221-237.
- Lederman, N. G. (1992). Students’ and teachers’ conceptions of the nature of science: A review of the research. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 29(4), 331-359.
- Lederman, N. G., Lederman, J. S., Khishfe, R., Druger, E., Gnoffo, G., & Tantoco, C., (2003, January/February). I can, you can, we all can!, Paper presented at the annual meeting of National Association for the Education of Teachers in Science, St Louis, MO.
- Lederman, N., & Lederman, J. (2004). Revising instruction to teach nature of science. The Science Teacher, 71(9), 36-39.
- Lederman, N.G. (2006). Research on nature of science: Reflections on the past, Anticipations of the future. Asia-Pasific Forum on Science Learning and Teaching. 7(1), 1-11
- Lederman, N.G., Abd-El-Khalick, F., Bell, R.L., & Schwartz, R.S. (2002). Views of nature of science questionnaire: Toward valid and meaningful assessment of learners‟ conceptions of nature of science. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 39 (6), 497–521. Doi: 10.1002/tea.10034.
- Lederman. N. G. (1986). Students’ and teachers’ understanding of the nature of science: A reassessment. School Science and Mathemathics, 86, 91-99.
- McComas, W.F. (1998). The Principal Elements Of Nature Of Science: Dispelling The Myths. W.F. McComas (ed). The Nature Of Science In Science Education: Rationales And Strategies, (53-70). Netherlands: Kluwer Academic.
- National Research Council. (1996). National science education standards. Washington DC: National Research Council. National Academic.
- Norris, S. P., & Phillips, L. M. (2003). How literacy in its fundamental sense is central to scientific literacy. Science education, 87(2), 224-240.
- PİSA 2012 Ulusal Ön Raporu. (2012). MEB Yenilik ve Eğitim Teknolojileri Genel Müdürlüğü.
- PİSA 2015 Ulusal Raporu. (2015). MEB Ölçme Değerlendirme ve Sınav Hizmetleri Genel Müdürlüğü.
- Pomeroy, D. (1993). Implications of teacher’s beliefs about the nature of science: Comparison of the beliefs of scientists, secondary science teachers, and elementary teachers. Science Education, 77(3), 261-278.
- Rudolph, J. L. (2000). Reconsidering the “nature of science” as a curriculum component. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 32, 403-419.
- Shamos, M. (1995). The myth of scientific literacy. New Brunswick NJ: Rutgers University.
- Şardağ, M., Aydın, S., Kalender, N., Tortumlu, S., Ciftci, M. & Perihanoglu, S.(2014). Bilimin doğası’nın ortaöğretim fizik, kimya ve biyoloji yeni öğretim programlarında yansıtılması. Education & Science/Egitim ve Bilim, 39 (174), 233-248.
- Tan, M. & Temiz, B. K. (2003). Fen öğretiminde bilimsel süreç becerilerinin yeri ve önemi. Pamukkale Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 1(13), 89-101.
- Taşar, M. F. (2006). Probing preservice teachers’ understandings of scientific knowledge by using a vignette in conjunction with a paper and pencil test. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 2(1), 53-70.
- Weld, J. (2004). The game of science education. Pearson Education.
- Yaman, M. (2009). Solunum ve enerji kazanımı konusunda öğrencilerin ilgisini çeken bağlam ve yöntemler. Hacettepe Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 215-228.
- Yeşiloğlu, S. N., Demirdöğen, B., Köseoğlu, F. (2010). Bilimin doğası öğretiminde ilk adım: yeni toplum etkinliği ve uygulanışı üzerine tartışmalar. Ahi Evran Üniversitesi Kırşehir Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 11(4), 163-186.
