DİN SOSYOLOJİSİNDE KLASİKLER: BELİRSİZ BİR MİRAS

Author :  

Year-Number: 2011-9
Yayımlanma Tarihi: 2018-11-01 17:43:01.0
Language : Türkçe
Konu :
Number of pages: 222-231
Mendeley EndNote Alıntı Yap

Abstract

Sosyoloji disiplininde, klasik eserlerin çağdaş teori ve araştrmalardaki rolünü ele alan periyodik bildiriler konusunda olumlu duygusal tepkiler oluşturabilecek sadece birkaç yayın vardır. Patlayan bastrılmış duygular, nadiren ortaya çıkan sosyolojik bir Altn Çağ özlemiyle ateşlenebileceği gibi, zaman zaman da sosyolojinin kurucu babalarının gün geçtkçe konu dışı kalması ile ilgili sabırsız açıklamalarla kolayca ateşlenebilir. Klasik eserlerin ısrarlı bir şekilde varlıklarını sürdürmeleri, bu eserler gerek faydalı ve gerekse zararlı olarak algılansınlar, sosyolojik girişimin ayrılmaz bir özelliği olup, genellikle gerçekleri gösteren, haksızlıkları ortaya çıkaran, radikal ve ant otoriter olarak görülen bir meslek için hiç de tuhaf bir durum değildir. Cümlelerin taşıdıkları derin manaların incelendiği (deconstructonism) entelektüel bir ortamda, bir anlamda geleneğin koruyucuları olan sosyologlar, klasik sosyoloji kanunlarının daha ileri düzeyde araştrılmasını teşvik eden keskin bir niteliğe sahiptr. Klasiklerin önemi üzerine uzun süredir yapılmakta olan ve gelişmeye devam eden tartşmalar, ortaya farklı düşünceler koymaları, derin tartşmalara yol açmaları ve tuhaf bağlantlar kurmaları gibi özellikleri sayesinde, sosyolojinin temel ya da meta teorik düzeyde uygulanmasına yönelik öngörüler sunarlar. Düşünce tarihçileri veya bilim ya da bilgi sosyologlarının bakış açısına göre, disiplinsel veya alt disiplinsel düzeyde sosyolojik temyiz gücünün boyutlarını karakterize edebilecek daha iyi bir başlangıç noktası yoktur. Sosyolojinin sosyolojisi perspektfnden bakıldığında ise klasikler, entelektüel saygınlıkları ile sembolik, mitolojik ve işlevsel özellikleri birbirine paralel sosyal olgulardır.

Keywords

Abstract

Keywords

Kaynakça

  • (***) Bu makalenin İngilizcesi, “Classics in the Sociology of Religion: An Ambiguous Legacy” başlığıyla, The Blackwell Companion to Sociology of Religion (ed. Richard K. Fenn), 2003, 133–161 sayfaları arasında yayımlanmıştır. Kaynaklar
  • Alexander, J.C. 1987. “The Centrality of the Classics,” in Social Theory Today, Eds. A. Giddens and J. Turner. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press, pp. 11-57.
  • Alexander, J.C, Ed. 1988. Durkheimian Sociology: Cultural Studies. Cambridge and New York: Cambridge University Press.
  • Barker, E. 1993. “Charismatization: the Social Production of an Ethos Propitious to the Mobilization of Sentiments,” in Secularization, Rationalism and Sectarianism, Eds. E. Barker, J.A. Beckford, and K. Dobbelaere. Oxford: Clarendon Press, pp. 181-201.
  • Becker, H.S. 1979. “What’s happening to sociology?” Society 16(5): 19-24. Beckford, J.A. 1990. “The Sociology of Religion 1945-1989,” Social Compass 37(1):45-64.
  • Beckford, J.A. 1991. “Quasi-Marxisms and the Sociology of Religion,” in Religion and the Social Order: New Developments in Theory and Research, vol. 1, Ed. D.G. Bromley. Greenwich CT: JAI Press, pp. 17-35.
  • Beckford, J.A. 1992. Religion and Advanced Industrial Society. London and New York: Rout- ledge.
  • Bellah, R.N. 1967. “Civil Religion in America,” Daedalus 96:1-21. Bellah, R.N. 1970. “Christi- anity and Symbolic Realism,” Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion 9:89-96.
  • Beyer, P. 1998. “Sociological Theory of Religion between Description and Prediction: A We- berian Question Revisited,” in Secularization and Social Integration, Eds. R. Laermans, B. Wilson, and J. Billiet. Leuven/Louvain: Leuven University Press, pp. 83-105.
  • Bloom, H. 1994. The Western Canon. New York, San Diego, London: Harcourt Brace.
  • Bottomore, T. 1981. “A Marxist Consideration of Durkheim,” Social Forces 59:902-17. Bruce, S., Ed. 1992. Religion and Modernization: Sociologists and Historians Debate the Secularization Thesis. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
  • Bruce, S. 1996. Religion in the Modern World. Oxford and New York: Oxford University Press.
  • Calhoun, C. 1996. “Whose Classics? Which Readings? Interpretation and Cultural Dif- ference in the Canonization of Sociological Theory,” in Social Theory and Sociology, Ed. S.P. Turner. Oxford and Cambridge, MA: Blackwell, pp. 70-96.
  • Calvino, I. 1986. “Why Read the Classics?” in The Uses of Literature: Essays, Transl. P. Creagh. San Diego, New York, London: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich, pp. 125-34.
  • Camic, C. 1992. “Reputation and Predecessor Selection: Parsons and the Institutional- ists,” American Sociological Review 57:421-44.
  • Collins, R. 1986. Weberian Sociological Theory. Cambridge and New York: Cambridge University
  • Collins, R. 1994. Four Sociological Traditions. New York and Oxford: Oxford University
  • Coser, L.A. 1977. Masters of Sociological Thought: Ideas in Historical and Social Context. San Di- ego, CA: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich.
  • Coser, L.A. 1981. “The Uses of Classical Sociological Theory,” in The Future of the Sociological Classics, Ed. B. Rhea. London: George Allen & Unwin, pp. 170-82.
  • Davis, M.S. 1986. ‘”That’s Classic!’ The Phenomenology and Rhetoric of Successful Social Theories,” Philosophy of the Social Sciences 16:285-301.
  • Demerath, N.J. 1995. “Rational Paradigms, A-Rational Religion and the Debate Over Secularization,” Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion 34(l):105-12.
  • Demerath, N.J. 1998. “Secularization Disproved or Displaced?” in Secularization and Social Integration, Eds. R. Laermans, B. Wilson, and J. Billiet. Leuven/Louvain: Leuven
  • Durkheim, E. 1961. The Elementary Forms of the Religious Life, Transl. N.W. Swain. New York: Collier. Eckberg, D.L. and Hill, L. 19 79. “The Paradigm Concept and Sociology: A Critical Review,” American Sociological Review 44: 925-3 7.
  • Eister, A.W. 1973. “H. Richard Niebuhr and the Paradox of Religious Organization,” in Beyond the Classics?, Eds. C.Y. Glock and P.E. Hammond. New York: Harper and Row, pp. 355-402.
  • Eliot, T.S. 1945. What is a Classic? London: Faber and Faber.
  • Evans-Pritchard, E.E. 1965. Theories of Primitive Religion. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
  • Fenn, R.K. 1982. “The Sociology of Religion: A Critical Survey,” in Sociology: The State of the Art,” Eds. T. Bottomore, S. Nowak, and M. Sokolowska. London and Beverly Hills: Sage, pp. 101-27.
  • Finke, R. and Stark, R. 1992. The Churching of America: 1776-1990. New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press.
  • Foucault, M. 1970. The Order of Things: The Archaeology of the Human Sciences. London: Tavistock.
  • Freese, L. 1972. “Cumulative Sociological Knowledge,” American Sociological Review 37:472-82.
  • Gans, H.J. 1992. “Sociological Amnesia: The Noncumulation of Normal Social Science,” So- ciological Forum 7(4):701-10.
  • Garrett, W.R. 1975. “Maligned Mysticism: The Maledicted Career of Troeltsch’s Third Type,” Sociological Analysis 36:205-23.
  • Giddens, A. 1976. “Classical Sociological Theory and the Origins of Modern Sociology,” American Journal of Sociology 81(4): 703-29.
  • Giddens, A. 1987. “Nine Theses on the Future of Sociology,” in Social Theory and Modern Sociology. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press, pp. 22-51.
  • Glock, C.Y. and Hammond, P.E., Eds. 1973. Beyond the Classics? Essays in the Scientific Study of Religion. New York: Harper & Row.
  • Gouldner, A. 1958. “Introduction,” in E. Durkheim, Socialism and Saint-Simon. Yellow Springs, OH: Antioch Press.
  • Green, B.S.R. 1977. “On the Evaluation of Sociological Theory,” Philosophy of the Social Sci- ences 7:33-50.
  • Habermas, J. 1984. Reason and the Rationalization of Society, Transl. T. McCarthy. Boston: Beacon Press.
  • Hadden, J.K. 1987. “Toward Desacralizing Secularization Theory,” Social Forces 65(3):587- 611.
  • Hadden, J.K. 1995. “Religion and the Quest for Meaning and Order: Old Paradigms, New Realities,” Sociological Focus 28(1):83-100.
  • Halbwachs, M. 1980. The Collective Memory, Transl. FJ. and V.Y. Ditter. New York: Harper& Row.
  • Halbwachs, M. 1992. On Collective Memory, ed. and transl. L.A. Coser. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
  • Hamilton, M.B. 1998a. Sociology and the World’s Religions. London: Macmillan.
  • Hamilton, M.B. 1998b. “Secularization: Now You See It, Now You Don’t,” Sociology Re- view 7(4):27-31. Hammond, P.E., Ed. 1985. The Sacred in a Secular Age: Toward Revision in the Scientific Study of Religion. Berkeley, Los Angeles, London: University of California Press.
  • Heelas, P. 1996. The New Age Movement: The Celebration of the Self and the Sacralization of Modernity. Oxford and Cambridge, MA: Blackwell.
  • Holton, RJ. 1996. “Classical Social Theory,” in The Blackwell Companion to Social Theory, Ed. B.S. Turner. Oxford and Maiden, MA: Blackwell, pp. 25-52.
  • Hook, S. 1955. Marx and the Marxists: The Ambiguous Legacy. New York: Van Nostrand.
  • Horton, R. 1960. “A Definition of Religion and its Uses,” Journal of the Royal Anthropological Institute 90:201-26.
  • Horton, R. 1968. “Neo-Tylorianism: Sound Sense or Sinister Prejudice?” Man: The Journal of the Royal Anthropological Institute 3:625-34.
  • Iannaccone, L.R. 1991. “The Consequences of Religious Market Structure,” Rationality and Society 3:156-77.
  • Iannaccone, L.R. 1997. “Rational Choice: Framework for the Scientific Study of Religion,” in Rational Choice Theory and Religion, Ed. L.A. Young. New York and London: Routledge, pp. 25-44.
  • Johnson, H.M. 1978. “Comment on Jones’s ‘On Understanding a Sociological Classic’,” American Journal of Sociology 84(1):171-5.
  • Jones, R.A. 1977. “On Understanding a Sociological Classic,” American Journal of Sociology 83(2):279-319.
  • Jones, R.A. 1978. “Subjectivity, Objectivity, and Historicity: A Reply to Johnson,” American Journal of Sociology 84(1): 175-81.
  • Jones, R.A. 1980. “Myth and Symbol Among the Nacirema Tsigoloicos: A Fragment,” American Sociologist 15:207-12.
  • Jones, R.A. 1983. “On Merton’s ‘History’ and ‘Systematics’ of Sociological Theory,” in Func- tions and Uses of Disciplinary Histories, vol. 7, Eds. L. Graham, W. Lepenies, and P. Weingart. Dordrecht, Boston, London: Reidel, pp. 121-42.
  • Jones, R.A. 1986. Emile Durkheim: An Introduction to Four Major Works. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
  • Kermode, F. 1975. The Classic. New York: Viking.
  • Kuhn, T. 1970. The Structure of Scientific Revolutions. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
  • LaCapra, D. 1982. “Rethinking Intellectual History and Reading Texts,”in Modern European Intellectual History: Reappraisals and New Perspectives, Eds. D. LaCapra and S.L. Kaplan. Ithaca, NY and London: Cornell University Press, pp. 47-85.
  • Lechner, F.J. 1991. “The Case Against Secularization: A Rebuttal,” Social Forces 69:1103- 19.
  • Lechner, F.J. 1997. “The ‘New Paradigm’ in the Sociology of Religion: Comment on War- ner,” American Journal of Sociology 103(l):182-92.
  • Lepenies, W. 1988. Between Literature and Science: The Rise of Sociology. Cambridge: Cambridge
  • Levin, M. 1973. “What Makes a Classic in Political Theory?” Political Science Quarterly 88(3):462-76.
  • Levine, D.N. 1985a. “On the Heritage of Sociology,” in The Challenge of Social Control, Eds. G.D. Suttles and M.N. Zald. Norwood NJ: Ablex, pp. 13-19.
  • Levine, D.N. 1985b. The Flight from Ambiguity. Chicago and London: University of Chicago
  • Levine, D.N. 1995. Visions of the Sociological Tradition. Chicago and London: University of Chi- cago Press.
  • Luckmann, T. 1967. The Invisible Religion: The Problem of Religion in Modern Society. Net York: Macmillan.
  • Luckmann, T. 1983. “Secularization - a Contemporary Myth,” in T. Luckmann, Lift World and Social Realities. London: Heinemann, pp. 124-32.
  • Luckmann, T. 1991. “The New and the Old in Religion,” in Social Theory for a Changin So- ciety, Eds. P. Bourdieu and J.S. Coleman. Boulder, San Francisco, Oxford: Westvie^ Press, pp. 167-88.
  • Lukes, S. 1966. “On the History of Sociological Theory,” British Journal of Sociolog 17:198-203.
  • Lyon, D. 1985. The Steeple’s Shadow: On the Myths and Realities of Secularization. London SPCK.
  • Manguel, A. 1998. “Review of J.L. Borges, Collected Fictions,” Toronto Globe and Mai Octo- ber 17:D9.
  • Martin, D. 1991. “The Secularization Issue: Prospect and Retrospect,” British Journal c So- ciology 42(3):465-74.
  • Martin, D. 1995. “Sociology, Religion and Secularization: An Orientation,” Religio
  • Marx, K. and Engels, F. 1958. Marx and Engels on Religion. Moscow: Foreign Language Pub- lishing House.
  • Merton, R.K. 1968. “On the History and Systematics of Sociological Theory,” in Sock The- ory and Social Structure. New York: Free Press, pp. 1-38.
  • Mills, C.W. 1960. “Introduction: the Classic Tradition,” Ed. C.W. Mills. Images of Mar New York: George Braziller, pp. 1-11.
  • Nisbet, R. 1966. The Sociological Tradition. New York: Basic Books.
  • Orum, A.M. 1989. Introduction to Political Sociology. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall
  • O’Toole, R. 1984. Religion: Classic Sociological Approaches. Toronto: McGraw-Hill Ryersor
  • O’Toole, R. 1993. “Classical Statements on Religion and Society,” in The Sociology of Rehgion: A Canadian Focus, Ed. W.E. Hewitt. Toronto: Butterworths, pp. 19-27.
  • Parsons, T. 1960. “Some Comments on the Pattern of Religious Organization in the United States,” in Structure and Process in Modern Society, Ed. T. Parsons. New York Free Press, pp. 295-321.
  • Parsons, T. 1963. “Christianity and Modern Industrial Society,” in Sociological Theori Val- ues and Sociocultural Change, Ed. E. Tiryakian. New York: Harper and Row, pp. 33-70.
  • Parsons, T. 1968. The Structure of Social Action. Glencoe, IL: Free Press.
  • Parsons, T. 1973. “Durkheim on Religion Revisited: Another Look at The Elementary Form of the Religious Life,” in Beyond the Classics? Eds. C.Y. Glock and P.E. Hammond. New York: Harper & Row, pp. 156-80.
  • Parsons, T. 1981. “Revisiting the Classics Throughout a Long Career,” in The Future of the Sociological Classics, Ed. B. Rhea. London: George Allen and Unwin, pp. 183-94.
  • Paul, G.E. 1993. “Why Troeltsch? Why Today? Theology for the 21st Century,” Christian Cen- tury 110:676-81.
  • Peel, J.D.Y. 1978. “Two Cheers for Empiricism; or, What is the Relevance of the History of Sociology to its Current Practice?” Sociology 12:347-59.
  • Poggi, G. 1972. Images of Society. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
  • Poggi, G. 1996. “Lego Quia Inutile: An Alternative Justification for the Classics,” in Social Theo- ry and Sociology, Ed. S.P. Turner. Oxford and Cambridge, MA: Blackwell, pp. 39-47.
  • Rhea, B., Ed. 1981. The Future of the Sociological Classics, London: George Allen &Unwin.
  • Ricoeur, P. 1971. “The Model of the Text,” Social Research 38:529-62.
  • Roelofs, G. 1994. “Charismatic Christian Thought: Experience, Metonymy and Routi- nization,” in Charismatic Christianity as a Global Culture, Ed. K. Poewe. Columbia, SC: University of South Carolina Press, pp. 217-33.
  • Sherman, L.W. 1974. “Uses of the Masters,” American Sociologist 9:176-81.
  • Shils, E. 1970. “Tradition, Ecology and Institution in the History of Sociology,” Daedalus 99(4):76O-825.
  • Skinner, Q. 1969. “Meaning and Understanding in the History of Ideas,” History and Theory 8(l):3-53.
  • Spickard, J.V. 1998. “Rethinking Religious Social Action: What is ‘Rational’ about Ra- tional-Choice Theory?” Sociology of Religion 59(2):99-115.
  • Stark, R. and Bainbridge, W.S. 1985. The Future of Religion. Berkeley, Los Angeles, Lon- don: University of California Press.
  • Stark, R. and Bainbridge, W.S. 1996. A Theory of Religion. New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers Uni- versity Press.
  • Steeman, T.M. 1984. “Troeltsch and Modern American Religion,” Archives de Sciences So- ciales des Religions 58(1):85-116.
  • Stinchcombe, A.L. 1982. “Should Sociologists Forget Their Mothers and Fathers?” American Sociologist 17:2-11.
  • Swanson, G.E. 1964. The Birth of the Gods. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
  • Szacki, J. 1982. “The History of Sociology and Substantive Sociological Theories,” in Sociology: The State of the Art, Eds. T. Bottomore, S. Novak, and M. Sokolowska. London and Beverly Hills: Sage, pp. 359-74.
  • Thompson, K. 1990a. “Religion: The British Contribution,” British Journal of Sociology
  • Thompson, K. 1990b. “Secularization and Sacralization,” in Rethinking Progress, Eds. J.C. Alex- ander and P. Szompka. London: Unwin Hyman, pp. 161-81.
  • Thompson, K. 1993. “Durkheim, Ideology and the Sacred,” Social Compass 40(3):451-
  • Tiryakian, E.A. 1981. “Durkheim’s ‘Elementary Forms’ as ‘Revelation’,” in The Future of the Sociological Classics, Ed. B. Rhea. London: George Allen and Unwin,,pp. 114-35.
  • Tocqueville, A.C. de. 1946. Democracy in America (2 vols.), Transl. H. Reeve and F. Bowen. New York: Alfred Knopf.
  • Tschannen, 0. 1991. “The Secularization Paradigm: A Systematization,” Journal for the Sci- entific Study of Religion 30:395-415.
  • Turner, J. 1986. “Review: the Theory of Structuration,” American Journal of Sociology.
  • Turner, S.P. 1991. “Salvaging Sociology’s Past,” A.S.A. Footnotes 19(5&6):6. Tylor, E. 1871. Primitive Culture (vol. 1). London: John Murray.
  • Wagner, D.G. and Berger, J. 1984. “Do Sociological Theories Grow?” American Journal Sociol- ogy 90(4):697-728.
  • Wallace, R.A. and Wolf, A. 1999. Contemporary Sociological Theory: Expanding the Classical Tra- dition. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
  • Wallerstein, I. 1991. Unthinking Social Science: The Limits of Nineteenth-Century Para- digms. Oxford: Polity Press.
  • Wallis, R. and Bruce, S. 1989. “Religion: The British Contribution,” British Journal of Sociology
  • Wallis, R. and Bruce, S. 1992. “Secularization: The Orthodox Model,” in Religion and Modern- ization, Ed. S. Bruce. Oxford: Clarendon Press, pp. 8-30.
  • Warner, R.S. 1993. “Work in Progress Toward a New Paradigm for the Sociological Study of Religion in the United States,” American Journal of Sociology 98(5):1044-93.
  • Weber, M. 1958. The Protestant Ethic and the Spirit of Capitalism, Transl. T. Parsons. New York: Scribner.
  • Weber, M. 1963. The Sociology of Religion, Transl. E. Fischoff. Boston: Beacon Press.
  • Westley, F. 1978. “ ‘The Cult of Man’: Durkheim’s Predictions and New Religious Move- ments,” Sociological Analysis 39:135-45.
  • Wilson, B.R. 1975. “The Debate Over ‘Secularization’,” Encounter 45(10):77-83.
  • Wilson, B.R. 1982. Religion in Sociological Perspective. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  • Wilson, B.R. 1985. “Secularization: The Inherited Model,” in The Sacred in a Secular Age Ed. P.E. Hammond. Berkeley, Los Angeles, and London: University of California Press pp. 9-20.
  • Wilson, B.R. 1992. “Reflections on a Many Sided Controversy,” in Religion and Moderniza- tion, Ed. S. Bruce. Oxford: Clarendon Press, pp. 195-210.
  • Wilson, B.R. 1998. “The Secularization Thesis: Criticisms and Rebuttals,” in Secularization and Social Integration, Eds. R. Laermans, B. Wilson, and J. Billiet. Leuven/Louvain Leuven University Press, pp. 45-65.
  • Winter, J.A. 1973. “The Metaphoric Parallelist Approach to the Sociology of Theistic Be- liefs,” Sociological Analysis 34:212-29.
MAKALE İSTATİSTİKLERİ

                                                                                                                                                                                                        

                                                                                                                                                                                                        

                                                                                                                                                                                                        
                                                                                                                                                                                                        
                                                                                                                                                                                                        

                                                                                                                                                                                                        

                                                                                                                                                                                                        



                                                                                                                                                                                                        

                                                                                                                                                                                                        
 
                                                                                                                                                                                                        
                      
                                                                                                                                                                                                        

                                                                                                                                                                                                        

                                                                                                                                                                                                        
LINKS

                                                                                                                                                                                                        
    
                                                                                                                                                                                                        
  • 
                                                                                                                                                                                                        
    
                                                                                                                                                                                                        
    

                                                                                                                                                                                                        
     Last issue
    
                                                                                                                                                                                                        
    
                                                                                                                                                                                                        
    • 
                                                                                                                                                                                                        
  • 
                                                                                                                                                                                                        
    
                                                                                                                                                                                                        
    
                                                                                                                                                                                                        
         Previous issues
    
                                                                                                                                                                                                        
    
                                                                                                                                                                                                        
    • 
                                                                                                                                                                                                        
  • 
                                                                                                                                                                                                        
    
                                                                                                                                                                                                        
    
                                                                                                                                                                                                        
    Article Statistics
    
                                                                                                                                                                                                        
    
                                                                                                                                                                                                        
    • 

                                                                                                                                                                                                        
                                                                                                                                                                                                        




                                                                                                                                                                                                        


                                                                                                                                                                                                        

                                                                                                                                                                                                        



                                                                                                                                                                                                        

                                                                                                                                                                                                        

                                                                                                                                                                                                        
Share