Author :
Abstract
Keywords
Abstract
It is known that there is ongoing sociological debate on basic characteristcs of today’s societes. Such a debate aims at comprehending the “soul of the age” through the concepts of modernity, post-modernity, globalizaton and secularism which are known as meta narratves. It is certain that since there are visible, signifcant differences among societes and even in the same society, no single concepts cannot reveal social relatonships or social reality. Each concept defne various aspects of the social reality. Therefore, a social scientst may employ differen perspectves to contribute to these theoretcal orientatons. It can be argued that these concepts that are discussed and studied in several social science disciplines defne certain relatonships that are also signifcant study topics for the sociology of religion
Keywords
- 2. Haralambus, M.-Holborn, M, Sociology, Themes and Perspectives, Collns Educational, London, 1997, s.479.
- 3. Mardin, Ş., “Religion in Modern Turkey”, The Islamic World and Japan, The Japan Foun- dation, Tokyo, 1981, s. 54-55.
- 4. Cumhuriyetin ilk yıllarında tarikat yapılanması ile ilgili sosyolojik tahlil için bkz: Günay, Ü.,”Türkiye’de Toplumsal Değişme ve Tarikatlar”, İslâmiyât, V/4, (Ekim-Aralık 2002), s. 141-162.
- 5. Vernon, G., Sciology of Religion Mcgraw-Hill Book com., New-York, 1962, s. 227-229.
- 6. Voll, J. O., “Renewal and Reformation in the Mid-Twentieth Century: Bediuzzaman Said Nursi and Religion in the 1950s”, The Muslim World, vol: LXXXIX, no: 3-4, July-October, 1999, s. 255; Kuru, Z. A. – Kuru, A., “Apolitical Intepretation of Islam: Said Nursi’s Faith – Based Activism in Comparison with Political Islam”, Islam and Christian-Muslim Relations, vol. 19, No. 1. January 2008, s.99-111.
- 7. Ebaugh, H.R., Gülen Hareketi, çev: Baldık, Ö., Doğan Kitap, İstanbul, 2010, s.53.
- 9. Aleviliğin kamusallaşması ile ilgili olarak bkz., Şahin, Ş., “The Rise of Alevism as a Public Religion”, Current Sociology, 53, 2005, s. 465-485.
- 10. Wolf, C., “How Secularised is Germany? Cohort and Comparative Perspectives”, Social Compass, 55, (2), 2008, s. 116.
- 12. Çiftçi, A., Anlayıcı Yaklaşım ve Din Sosyolojisi İçin Uzanımları, Kitabiyat, Ankara, 2003, s.259.
- 14. Akyol, T., “Postmodern Tarikatlar”, Milliyet, 13 Aralık 2010.
- 15. “Heteroglossia and Dictatorship” Today’s Zaman, 23 Aralık 2010.
- 16. Robertson, R., “A New Perspective on Religion and Secularization in the Global Con- text”, Secularization and Fundamentalism Reconsidered, ed. Hadden, J. – Shape, A.,vol. III,Paragon House, New York, 1989, s. 63-78.
- 17. Gülen hareketinin küresel bir cemaat haline gelmesi ile ilgili olarak bkz., Gürel, K., “Küre- sel Cemaat”, Milliyet, 23 Kasım 2010.
- 18. Özbudun, E.-Keyman, F.,”Cultural Globalization in Turkey”, ed. Aoki, T., Many Globaliza- tion: Cultural Diversity in the Contemporary World, Oxford Univ. Press, Cary, NC, USA, 2002, s. 301.
- 20. Jary, David-Jary, Julia, The Harpercollins Dictionary of Sociology, Harper Perennial, New York 1991, 363-364.
- 22. Keyman, F., “Özerklik mi eşit vatandaşlık mı?”, Radikal 2, 02/01/2011.
- 23. Ceylan, Y., İslam ve İslami Partiler, Radikal İki, 19/12/2011.
- 24. Güler, İ., “İnsan Merkez Midir?”, Radikal 2, 2 Ocak 2011.
