Author :
Abstract
Bu çalışma, Antonio Gramsci’nin hegemonya konseptindeki Avrupamerkezciliği analiz etmeye yönelik bir araştırmaya dayanmaktadır. Önceki çalışmalar hegemonya konseptinin kapitalist toplumlarda burjuvazi ile proletarya arasındaki tarihsel çekişmeyi açıklamak için geliştirildiğini ortaya koymaktadır. Rıza ve zorlamayı içeren hegemonya oluşturma stratejileri ve karşı hegemonik mücadelenin ortaya çıkışı, Gramsci’nin hegemonya konseptinin ana bileşenleridir. Kapitalist ekonomik model Batı toplumsal yapısında ortaya çıkmış ve Gramsci bunu hegemonya konseptine ilişkin analizinde ele almıştır. Önceki çalışmalarda Gramsci’nin hegemonya konseptinin Avrupamerkezci doğası üzerine kapsamlı bir analiz yapılmamıştır. Avrupamerkezciliğin tarihsel evrimi ve hegemonya konseptinin analizi ile bu çalışma, Gramsci’nin hegemonya konseptinin Avrupamerkezci doğasını sunmayı amaçlamaktadır. Araştırma bulguları, ABD'nin dünya siyasetindeki hegemonik konumunun oluşumu incelenerek açıklanmaktadır.
Keywords
Abstract
This study is based on a research related to analyze the Eurocentrism in Antonio Gramsci’s concept of hegemony. Recent analyses reveal that the notion of hegemony has been developed in the capitalist societies to explain the historical contest between bourgeoisie and proletariat. Strategies for the formation of hegemony, including using consent and coercion as well as the emergence of the counter-hegemonic struggle are the main components of Gramsci’s conception. The capitalist economic model emerged in the Western social structure and Gramsci covered this in his analysis of the concept of hegemony. However, previous studies did not perform a comprehensive analysis of the Eurocentric nature of Gramsci’s concept. With an analysis of the historical evolution of Eurocentrism and the notion of hegemony, this study aims to present the Eurocentric nature of Gramsci’s concept of hegemony. The research findings are explained through analyzing the formation of the hegemonic position of US in the world politics.
Keywords
- Amin, Samir. Eurocentrism. London: Zed Books, 1989.
- Anderson, Perry. “The Antinomies of Antonio Gramsci”. New Left Review 100, (1976), 5– 79.
- Barrett, Michele. “Ideology, Politics, Hegemony: From Gramsci to Laclau and Mouffe.” Mapping Ideology. ed. Žižek, Slovoj. 235-264. London-NewYork: Verso, 1997.
- Bhambra, Gurminder K. Rethinking Modernity: Postcolonialism and the Sociological Imagination. London: Palgrave Macmillan, 2007.
- Blaut, James M. "Colonialism and the Rise of Capitalism." Science & Society 53/3, (1989), 260-96.
- Cox, Robert W. Production, Power and World Order. New York: Columbia University Press, 1987.
- Cox, Robert W. & Sinclair, Timothy J. “The Global Political Economy and Social Choice (1991)”. Approaches to World Order . ed. Cox, Robert W., 191-208. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1996.
- Gramsci, Antonio. Selections from the Prison Notebooks. Trans. and Eds. by Quintin Hoare and Geoffrey Nowell Smith. New York: International Publishers, 1971.
- Gramsci, Antonio. Selections from Political Writings 1921-1926. London: Lawrence and Wishart, 1978.
- Gramsci, Antonio. The Southern Question. Trans. and annotated by P. Verdicchio. West Lafayette, IN: Bordighera, 1995.
- Gündüz, Mustafa. “Kültür ve Medeniyet Bağlamında Batı Merkezci Eğitim ve Eleştirisi.” İnsan & Toplum 3/6 (2014), 223 - 243.
- Ikenberry, John. “Rethinking the Origins of American Hegemony.” Political Science Quarterly 104/3 (1989), 375-400.
- Jessop, Bob. Hegemonya, Post-Fordizm ve Küreselleşme Ekseninde Kapitalist Devlet. Istanbul: Iletisim, 2005.
- Keohane, Robert O. After Hegemony: Cooperation and Discord in the World Political Economy. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1984.
- Laclau, Ernesto & Mouffe, Chantal. Hegemony and Socialist Strategy Towards a Radical Democratic Politics. London, New York: Verso, 1985.
- Lobell, Steven E. The Challenge of Hegemony: Grand Strategy, Trade and Domestic Politics. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press, 2003.
- McDougall, E. Ann. “Discourse and Distortion: Critical Reflections on Studying the Saharan Slave Trade.” Outre-Mers. Revue d’histoire 89/336 (2002), 195–227.
- Meiser, Jeffrey W. “Liberalism”. International Relations Theory. ed. Stephen McGlinchey et. al., 22-27. Bristol: E-International Relations Publishing, 2017.
- Paupp, Terrence E. “Questions and Answers About Resistance to American Hegemony”. The Future of Global Relations. ed. Terrence E. Paupp. 171-192. New York: Palgrave Macmillan, 2009.
- Said, Edward. Orientalism. New York: Vintage Books, 1978.
- Sassoon, Anne S. “Prison Notebooks”. The Dictionary of Marxist Thought (Second ed.). ed. Bottomore, Tom et. al., 446 - 447. Oxford: Blackwell Publishers Ltd, 1991.
- Weber, Hermann. “Kommunistische Internationale”. Lexikon des Sozialismus. ed. Thomas Meyer et. al., Köln: Bund-Verlag, 1986.
- Wilkinson, David. “Hegemonia: Hegemony, Classical and Modern.” Journal of World- Systems Research XIV/2, (2008), 119-141.
- Yıldızoğlu, Ergin. Hegemonyadan İmparatorluğa. Istanbul: Everest, 2003.
